Leadership: angel and monster - Mother Teresa and Lady Gaga

Published: 2011-07-22   There are 8 comments ... please add yours below

This Potshot was prompted by:

“The angel and the monster”
The Schumpeter column, The Economist June 2nd 2011

URL: http://www.economist.com/node/18772204?story_id=18772204&fsrc=nlw|hig|06-02-2011|editors_highlights

(Please note: pages linked here may require a subscription with the publisher to view the full page)

You can lead with impact if you get a few key actions right – and drive those hard
avoiding the middle ground where many are competing for attention and followers

We all want the success pill. But, most of us fail to find it. Not least since we’re unwilling to be different. And, even for those who find it, the pill isn’t a quick-acting one. The key is endless practice and perseverance. Check the winners podium. There you’ll see maverick business people like Richard Branson and Steve Jobs – and also others, like Mother Teresa and Lady Gaga. A charity worker and an entertainer. What’s their secret? Here are five things you could explore.

  1. Make it PERSONAL: Jobs and Branson are the personification of their companies. Or, more accurately, Apple and Virgin are the corporatisation of Jobs and Branson. They are mascots as much as managers. Neither these two nor Lady Gaga and Mother Teresa were ever accused of being shrinking violets. It’s about them – but also you! They let you know who they are and reach out for you to join them as they change the world. They’re all the subject of books. They have fans but also critics. They’re out there. Takes courage!
  2. Have an appealing PURPOSE: whether that’s to upend the digital world or help the marginalised. In each case, the questions driving the leader’s story have both clarity and force. For Lady Gaga they are summarised (in The Economist column referenced above) as: who am I; who are we; and, where are we going together? No wonder such leaders attract supporters – whether amongst techos, the fashionable or Lady Gaga’s teenagers, who feel ill-at-ease in the world.
  3. Establish unusual POSITIONING: while pundits talk up good behaviour, we often follow leaders, who step way outside it. People, who’re passionate. Who innovate and take risks. For whom, the journey has no final destination. For them, there’s always more to do – to make the world better, whether with groundbreaking products, better travel options, less poverty or enfranchising those, who feel misunderstood. For them, their leader must be a beacon of hope and change.
  4. Be relentless in your PROMOTION: figures in history often create their own PR (as Napoleon did in reporting his battles, often gilding the truth) or write the history (as Churchill did) or, as with our current four, ensuring they constantly generate news – in Lady Gaga’s case reinforcing her unique social media profile. Like her, you may even have your special words and language. Would anyone else call their followers “monsters”?
  5. Deliver PERFORMANCE: The Economist column fails to address this element. Without it, none of our four would be anything other than noisy exhibitionists. Paris Hiltons notable only for being notable. Their differentiation is combining talent, hard work and continual innovation to supercharge their image – delivering today and constantly promising more for the future.

The Economist writer is correct in recognising the importance of people like both the Mother Angel and the Lady Monster – and all their corporate equivalents. However, the article strays when it speaks about the need for “charisma” or the more contemporary “leadership projection”. For me, these are the outcomes. Lazy shorthand expressions. The challenge is to find the actions you need to take to emulate Lady Gaga, who has the “ability to build emotional commitment.” For me, that’s the essence of leadership: creating followership. What’s your view?

Would you like to reproduce this Potshot? See License Terms



Dr. Timothy Pascoe AM
PhD (Cambridge), MBA (Harvard), BE & BEc (Adelaide)
Creator, V|E|C|T|O|R Leadership®



Name
*will be displayed beside your comment
Email address
*won't be displayed
Comment
Conditions of posting: please feel free to post your views, but note that any post that is defamatory, contains bad language, or is spam will be blocked and deleted.
*
Email me when other comments are posted

Fields marked with * are required

Comments (8)

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/07/26 03:25 pm


Dear John,

An old guy like me has to pretend, from time to time, that he knows what's going on in the contemporary world. However, as you can see from reply to Peter below, I'm faking it somewhat!

Good to hear from you and trust you're well,

Timothy

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/07/26 03:23 pm


Dear Keith,

You're right about Mother Teresa and Lady Gaga being an odd pairing. However, I find it fascinating that such common lessons and themes can be drawn from such disparate careers.

All the best,

Timothy

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/07/26 03:20 pm


Dear Peter,

I enjoyed writing about Mother Teresa and Lady Gaga. However, where music is concerned, my passion lies with classical music (a Haydn string quartet is playing in my office as I write and, tonight my wife and I go to hear a recently composed opera "Of mice and men").

Much to learn about leadership from the arts!

Thanks for the link to your site.

Best,

Timothy

John Burrows - date: 2011/07/26 10:40 am

Timothy
This is good because of its contemporary feel. You hit a lot of nails on the head and rightfully note leadership is about performance, getting the right things done.

Keith Flanagan - date: 2011/07/25 07:17 pm

Mother Teresa and Lady Gaga in the same sentence! Thats something I never thought I'd read in my life time. Brilliant comparisons I must say.
I agree entirely with the point you make, However, the article strays when it speaks about the need for charisma or the more contemporary leadership projection.

Peter Cook - date: 2011/07/25 05:46 pm

Great post Timothy. I have just finished my own article on Lady G as I was asked to write one for an international MBA networking forum. It will be out in a few days time.

In the meantime Lady Gaga gets a mention in my blog a few weeks back. Check it out here http://humandynamics.wordpress.com

atb

Peter

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/07/25 03:17 pm


Dear Phadke,

What a great acronym: PHD - passion, hunger, discipline.

As you say, these are key ingredients for success.

While I admire Rupert Murdoch greatly for what he has built, some of his recent problems may stem from a lack of your third requirement: discipline.

In the case of Enron and many companies that failed in the GFC, the lack of discipline was not just operational but also moral.

This raises a possible corollary to your acronym: if a leader has an excess of any one attribute, it may override one of the others. For example, in the lead-up to the GFC, hunger driving out discipline.

Thanks for your contribution.

Timothy

Phadke Subodhkumar Narayan - date: 2011/07/25 02:23 pm

Dr. Timothy Sir,

Read original article as well as your potshot. I liked it. Your potshot is real time and calls for actions across every organisation. I have been reading + watching about Mr. Steve Jobs for many years. In many business aspects, he is truly inspirational.

I call him PHD Steve Jobs.
Here P stands for passion.
H stands for hunger
D stands for discipline.

Three basic ingredients for anyone to succeed.
Be it in home or in colony or in society or in office or in nation or across globe at large.

Thanks a lot for writing this potshot and sharing it with unknown numbers of web users on net.

Sincerely I remain,

Phadke


Would you like to reproduce this Potshot?

We encourage people to republish this Potshot online, or in print. However, please take the time to read our License Terms and so that you can properly attribute the republished Potshot