Leadership: yes, but what about self-leadership?

Published: 2011-10-16   There are 8 comments ... please add yours below

You can lead others and achieve great outcomes once you know how to lead yourself
not expecting others to accept the guidance and direction you’ve failed to accept yourself

The renown blogger, Seth Godin, hits home runs oftener than most. Here’s a recent one* that was short but sharp. “The job of the CEO isn't to check things off the agenda. Her job is to set the agenda, to figure out what's next. Now that more and more of us are supposed to be CEOs of our own lives and careers, it might be time to rethink who's setting your agenda.” Putting this another way … as leaders, we need to lead ourselves before we try to lead others. If you can’t do that, you can hardly be a credible or trustworthy model. So here are six aspects of your self-leadership to check – to see if you merit the licence to lead others.

  • Objective: are you clear what you personally need to achieve in your current role – your deliverables? Can you see what the right outcome would look like? Do you understand the unique value you have to add? And, the personal weaknesses you need to address?
  • Conviction: have you been able to convince yourself so you speak with enthusiasm of the coming journey? Words are less important than the tone and impression – both for you and others. In terms of execution, do you have the upfront fortitude for self-leadership?
  • Values: what should they be and do you live them? Before delivering feedback to others, are you honest with yourself? Having identified personal value-gaps, what have you done? On this (as in other things), do you seek input and guidance?
  • Delivery: do you get stuff done – meeting personal metrics? If not, how well are you leading yourself, let alone others? Are you commercially and technically competent? Are you efficient with your time and energy? What do you most need to improve?
  • Integration: are you self-aware and manage your internal dialogue constructively? Do you observe how you treat yourself? If not, it will be hard later to manage and monitor interactions with others – reading and responding to their needs.
  • Resilience: how creative are you at addressing changes around you? Do you capitalise happily – seeing opportunities? Or, curse your fate? Do you envisage new options or get dragged down? At the most basic, do you adjust your diary to match new priorities?

On which of the six factors above, do you most need to lift your self-leadership? Where specifically do you need to improve? What are your three immediate actions going to be?

There’s no point seeking responsibility for others, if you’re not first responsible for yourself. Self-leadership is the most challenging and, until you’ve built a reputation there, it’s cheeky to expect others to find you worth following. Please, share your thoughts below.

http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2011/04/the-agenda.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Fsethsmainblog+%28Seth%27s+Blog%29

Would you like to reproduce this Potshot? See License Terms



Dr. Timothy Pascoe AM
PhD (Cambridge), MBA (Harvard), BE & BEc (Adelaide)
Creator, V|E|C|T|O|R Leadership®



Name
*will be displayed beside your comment
Email address
*won't be displayed
Comment
Conditions of posting: please feel free to post your views, but note that any post that is defamatory, contains bad language, or is spam will be blocked and deleted.
*
Email me when other comments are posted

Fields marked with * are required

Comments (8)

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/11/03 07:30 am


Dear Shankar,

Thanks for your comment. Those little tricks and reminders are really powerful: something to jog our memory and make us a bit more self-aware!

Best wishes,

Timothy

Shankar Raman - date: 2011/11/02 05:57 pm

Timothy, how true and how relevant. One of my self-check habit is to remind myself that when I point one finger at someone else, there are three of my fingers pointing back at me.

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/10/17 05:17 pm


Dear Ken,

A great post backed up with some very good examples. I have no quibble with anything you say.

However, I would add something. While it does not negate the need for personal values and self-control on the part of bankers and others in the private sector, I am appalled at the incompetence (or worse) of the appointed regulators in so many of the cases you raise.

Too often, the regulators become captives of the industries they are meant to be oversighting. And, like so many generals, spend most of their time fighting the last war rather than the current one.

Much of the GFC fall-out could have been avoided if the regulators (and under their guidance the politicians) had ensured that the regulatory remit was extended to cover the newer derivatives - as well as plain old products like lending and the simpler traditional derivatives.

The politicians also encouraged (rather than discouraged) a lot of the worst lending practices e.g. the granting of mortgages to applicants, who would not have passed any reasonable test of their capacity to service the loan they were taking on.

None of this negates your point. It only extends the responsibility to further players - and those from whom one would expect higher ethical standards.

Best wishes,

Timothy

Ken Wilder - date: 2011/10/17 05:03 pm


Dear Timothy,

In spite of my recent lack of comment on your leadership "Potshots" I read them with great interest.
The current issue contains a passing reference to the need to take into account personal values in management decisions.

While you would not wish to appear to take on the role of a moralist, there is surely a need to place greater emphasis on responsibility in decision making. Current outrage at the financial world's failure to act responsibly must be on most peoples minds. Management decisions based on anti-social greed is an example.

Another is the failure of companies involved in
processes which if not controlled correctly lead to chemical spills. How does this happen? Yes, accidents but also cost cutting procedures placing profit before public safety.

How does a tobacco company executive, knowing they are producing a legal but dangerous drug, ever wonder about the ethics of their work and its results?

The current situation at Qantas has senior executives
being paid obscene sums of money, making excellent profits for the company while seeking so called "efficiencies" opposed by outrage at
every level within the organisation and met with bemusment and anger by the public.

In a nutshell, responsible capitalism is good, irresponsible capitalism is threatening the security of the entire western world and the root cause is greed.

My potshot for today !

Best wishes,

Ken Wilder.

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/10/17 04:13 pm


Dear Kurt,

I really like the following in your comment below: "it's about being half a step ahead of your team, to be ready to answer the questions they are now beginning to ask and the new ones they are about to raise in the next awakening."

I entirely agree. However, for some leaders, there is a prior step needed: to become aware of their team members current needs and concerns and, recognise how competent and developed these people are. In that sense, catch up with them!

Once the leader has done that, he or she can aim for the goal you outline.

Thanks,

Timothy

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/10/17 04:07 pm


Dear Richard,

As you say, in the heat of day-to-day leading and all its challenges, it's hard for any leader to remember that he or she has development needs as well.

I was with a team this morning: all good and effective leaders and deeply concerned about the development of their people. However, the focus today was entirely on them. We do this about three times a year and, as result of this process over the last 12 months, they've not only become better leaders of others but much better and self-aware leaders of themselves.

Many thanks,

Timothy

Kurt Rieger - date: 2011/10/17 11:48 am

Hi Timothy - self leadership - it's about being half a step ahead of team, to be ready to answer the questions they are now beginning to ask and the new ones they are about to raise in the next awakening. Organisational leadership is possible by building the team of the individual self leaders specialists with detailed knowledge in their field of expertise. That is the challenge for today in this rapidly changing business environment. There is no single person that can know it all - complexity of modern business makes sure of that!

Richard Harding - date: 2011/10/17 10:04 am

Tim, what a timely and useful reminder of the role of self reflection in leadership and the continuing need to be aware of your own development path as much as those around and supporting you. I love the six point - simple, quick and effective. Stops and makes you think.
thanks for sharing with me. R


Would you like to reproduce this Potshot?

We encourage people to republish this Potshot online, or in print. However, please take the time to read our License Terms and so that you can properly attribute the republished Potshot